It criticized Rozhestvenski for allowing his ships to fire upon the British ships, but noted that "as each [Russian] vessel swept the horizon in every direction with her searchlights to avoid being taken by surprise, it was difficult to prevent confusion". The report also concluded that once the mistake was known "Admiral Rozhestvenski personally did everything he could, from beginning to end of the incident, to prevent [the trawlers] from being fired upon by the squadron".
Rozhestvenski believed from the start that the plan to send the Baltic Fleet to Port Arthur was ill-conceived, and vehemently opposed plans to include a motley collection of obsolete vessels, the Third Pacific Squadron to his fleet referred to by the Admiral and his staff as the 'self-sinkers' , to the extent of refusing to reveal to the Admiralty his exact routing from Madagascar and to share his battle plan with Third Pacific Squadron commander Nikolai Nebogatov. Naval intelligence had already informed Togo of Rozhestvensky's mission, that of reaching Vladivostok , and avoiding contact with the Japanese navy if at all possible, and fighting as little as possible, if forced into it.
Rozhestvensky's objective was to reinforce the Vladivostok Squadron , and then, when the Russian navy felt sufficiently prepared, they would engage the Japanese navy in a decisive action.
With this knowledge in possession, Togo planned on preempting the Russian plan, by positioning his battle fleet to "bring the Russian fleet to battle, regardless of the speed of either battlefleet. He chose the former, and by the evening of 27 May , Rozhestvensky's flagship and the majority of his fleet were on the bottom of the Tsushima Straits. During the battle, Rozhestvensky was wounded in the head by a shell fragment.
The unconscious admiral was transferred to the destroyer Buinii and subsequently to the destroyer Bedovii. He was taken prisoner when the ship was later captured by the Imperial Japanese Navy. Defeat is a common fate of a soldier. There is nothing to be ashamed of in it. The great point is whether we have performed our duty. In , Rozhestvensky faced court-martial for the disaster, along with each of his surviving battleship commanders.
Some faced prison and some the firing squad for either losing the battle or surrendering on the high seas. The Tsar's court was fully aware that Admiral Nikolai Nebogatov had surrendered the Russian fleet, as Rozhestvensky had been wounded and unconscious for most of the battle, and was very reluctant to accept his statements of responsibility.
Nonetheless, Rozhestvensky was adamant in his defense of his subordinate commanders and maintained total responsibility, pleading guilty to losing the battle.
As was expected and hoped by the courts, the Tsar commuted the death-sentenced captains to short prison terms and pardons for the remaining officers. Makarov had been the most promising with his "energy, tactics" and his "ability to inspire confidence in his subordinates. Although Makarov may have been Russia's greatest asset in the war, had he survived, he may not have been the right choice to lead the "Baltic Fleet" later redesignated the 2nd Pacific Fleet to the Far East. Even without battleship combat experience, Admiral Rozhestvensky was the one man with the personality, skill, and determination to sail an untested battleship fleet on an unprecedented voyage to the other side of the world.
So much that Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm remarked to the Czar during a fleet exercise in , "I wish I had such splendid admirals as your Captain Rozhestvensky in my fleet! Rozhestvensky's future opponent, on the other hand, had fought a battleship fleet action at Port Arthur on February 9, , against Admiral Stark who flew his flag in the battleship Petropavlovsk.
Stark had utilized his shore batteries along with his battle fleet to assist him during this fight, a lesson not lost on Admiral Togo; and only 4 Russian cruisers were slightly damaged during the 40 minute engagement. On 13 April Makarov, flying his flag on the battleship Petropavlovsk went out to rescue his destroyers , and in doing so, confronted Togo's battlefleet. Outgunned, he turned about and his battleship struck a mine and sank, taking Makarov to the bottom.
In the first long range gun duel in history, the Battle of the Yellow Sea , in which opponents opened up with 12 inch guns at over 14, yards 13, meters , this, at a time when the world's navies were " Admiral Togo had fired nearly 1, 12 inch and 8 inch shells, and well over six thousand 6 inch or lesser shells during the nearly day long sea battle. And even though no ships were sunk during the engagement, it was " Even though Admiral's Rozhestvensky and Togo were evenly matched in age, both had been born in , Rozhestvensky was about to engage at Tsushima the only modern battleship combat experienced admiral in existence.
Admiral Togo had already killed two enemy admirals Makarov and Vitgeft , driven another away Stark , and would very nearly kill Admiral Rozhestvensky in the coming battle on 27 May at Tsushima. But Rozhestvensky wasn't cut from the same cloth as the other Russian Admirals, with the possible exception of Makarov, and he certainly was more aggressive and determined than was Vice admiral Reinhard Scheer who turned his battlefleet degrees in the opposite direction when faced with the British Grand Fleet at Skagerrak in  To his credit, Rozhestvensky knew Admiral Togo's background, knew what he was up against, and did what arm chair commanders have dreamed of doing since wars have existed; Rozhestvensky used his battleships for what they were designed to do, he charged forward to his objective, and in doing so, charged Togo's battleline.
Rozhestvensky lived out the last years of his life in St Petersburg as a recluse.
He died of a heart attack in and was buried in the Alexander Nevsky Lavra. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Zinovy Petrovich Rozhestvensky. Zinovy Zinik Anyone at home? Chenjerai Hove A journey without maps. Seloua Luste Boulbina Being inside and outside simultaneously. Exile, literature, and the postcolony: On Assia Djebar. Slavenka Drakulic Bathroom tales. How we mistook normality for paradise. Come the time to open the library with books, the school director asked me to be the guest of honour, meaning I would make the main speech.
Also invited was the Regional Director of Education for Harare, the Member of parliament for the area, and other education officials. The ceremony was to be out in open air. As I walked into the school yard, all the official chairs were empty. I sat there at the front, alone with the director of the school, who told me:. They said you are too political and they would not share a platform with you. But he assured me:. The second incident was almost the same.
Students at the local high school were studying my novel, Bones. The teacher, a former colleague and fellow college student, invited me to give a lecture. I went and talked to the students about my own experience creating the novel. But on leaving the school, the teacher and I encountered an irate school director. What was I doing in his school without his knowledge and government clearance? The school director was deeply offended and he stormed away, threatening immediate punitive action. And the teacher was soon on suspension from his duties.
While on suspension, he found another job and never returned to the school again. The two incidents show that I was already in internal exile before I physically left. I refused every time. Time passed and I decided to leave the country: external exile, geographically but not emotionally. In this new exile, I have learnt to cherish hearing the voices of my country more intensely; the songs of the local birds echo in my dreams with a new freshness.
For I had not been able to listen to them enough as I busied myself with so many wounds on my heart and soul. I had ignored even the flame lily, our unofficial national flower. But now in this new exile, my poetry vibrates with the sound of the flower as it speaks to me in a new language of longing, a language of desire, a voice of a deep yearning which makes me write. Creativity is a space for solitary longing, the desire to be elsewhere in space and time, to be in a new ideal world where life is as it should be.
For me, physical exile has nourished me with new literary and artistic voices. Sometimes there are new empty spaces when I take my pen and cannot name the trees and the birds I see through the window. It becomes a dialogue with myself as I struggle to create a new language for a new soul which is a complex mixture of the old and the new.
Zinovy Pritsker | Coney Island History Project
The new voices flood my soul and I begin to hear my own voice more clearly, in the snow, in the winds that blow from wrong directions, in the people who sometimes seem so distant from my vision of the world. But somehow, we manage to meet if we search deeply enough. So, exile can be an inspiration because of the desire it creates in the writer.
Related Zinovys Journey
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved